“Climate scientists in New Zealand today accused the foremost climate-research institution in New Zealand of data manipulation of the same type as the East Anglia Climatic Research Institute (CRU) is alleged to have done.”
Story From The National Examiner – New Zealand
“Treadgold’s group alleges that the NIWA graph was produced, not from the raw data that NIWA supplied, but rather from temperature readings that had been adjusted. The CSC scientists were able to obtain the adjusted dataset from an un-named associate of Dr. M.
James Salinger, formerly of NIWA and, before that, of CRU. Comparison of the two datasets shows significant upward adjustments of the post-1909 data and equally significant downward adjustments of the pre-1909 data, thus producing a downtrend and then an uptrend, instead of the nearly flat trend that Treadgold’s group found.”
It seems that the true data from New Zealand is still available, unlike the data from the UK. When all the false data is shaken out it does NOT show Global Warming is the trend. It is damn near a flat line from 1853 to 2008. One need not wonder who is telling the lies. There simply is NO money in a stable climate. But there is heaps of cash for climate scientists to study Global Warming
or the now, more popular Climate Change. I am not one to put much stock in conspiracy theories, but I have a lot of faith in GREED.
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
You must be logged in to post a comment.