This one is for my partner tim… He loves this ‘Global Warming’ stuff! 
In Front Page Magazine today, there is an article on ‘global warming’, that states:
Here are three indisputable scientific facts about climate that are sufficient on their own to throttle any claims of manmade global warming.
First, we know from studies of Antarctic ice that, over the last 650,000 years or so, warmer temperatures have preceded increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels by hundreds, if not thousands of years. The ice studies indicate that the carbon-dioxide-causes-global warming theory is precisely backwards.
Second, during the 20th century, there is simply no correlation between carbon dioxide emissions and global temperature. Not only did most of the century’s temperature rise occur before most of the century’s manmade greenhouse gas emissions, but during 1940-1975 global temperatures actually declined while atmospheric carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide emission levels steadily increased.
Finally, the ultimate test of a scientific theory is whether it has predictive value. We used Newton’s laws of physics, for example, to land men on the moon. Unfortunately, there are no climate models that predict trends and changes in global climate with any degree of accuracy. Think about the recent failures with hurricane season predictions or even the risk of relying on what your local weatherman predicts for tomorrow’s weather – and you’ll start to get an idea of how far away science is from predicting global climate 10, 50 and 100 years from now.
One Response
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
My friend admin has it right. I think that Global Warming or, “Climate Change,” as it is now called, is the biggest lie ever to come up the pike. These folks are trying to predict Climate Change with a limited number of variables. There is no Super Computer, yet built, that can take into account ALL of the variables. The plain fact of the matter is that the folks that are trying very hard to convince us have no idea what is, or is not, an important variable. Or, what they all are. The SUN, for instance, has been left out of the current mathematical model.
Imagine that: They counted the sun’s impact on climate to ZERO.
You must be logged in to post a comment.